Initial Plans

Scope

The Working Group should cover all issues related to systems starting from (and including) the sources, up to the start of the main linac.  There are certainly particular issues that it will be important to address during the workshop, but we aim to be inclusive in discussing ideas that people want to raise, as long as they are relevant to the injection systems.

Aims  

Topics of discussion are likely to fall into one of two categories:  

A.  Systems described in (or closely resembling those described in) current proposals for a future linear collider.

 

Examples include the TESLA positron source and the NLC Main Damping Ring.   Discussion could be focused towards trying to answer the following questions:

 

A1.    What are the current design performance levels of the injection systems, as demonstrated by recent R&D?  

A2.    What effects limit the performance, and how well are these effects understood?  

A3.    What are the significant technical risks?  

A4.    What R&D is required to:  

(a) demonstrate the validity of present designs (if necessary);  

(b) produce simpler/cheaper systems with similar performance;  

(c) reduce the technical risk;  

(d) improve the performance of the systems?  

A5.    What are the likely timescales/costs/benefits, of R&D identified in (4)?  

A6.    What are the opportunities for collaboration on the different systems?  

A7.    Could the design for one machine be used with benefits for another machine?

 

B.  Systems with novel features, or providing capability not presently included in LC descriptions.

 

Examples include polarized positron sources, or damping rings consisting entirely of combined function dipoles.   Discussion could be focused towards trying to answer the following questions:

 

B1.    What are the likely benefits of the proposed system, over the existing design (if any exists)?  

B2.    What other systems are impacted by changing the design?  

B3.    What R&D is required to develop the new concept into a practical design with acceptable technical risk?  

B4.    What are the likely timescales/costs/benefits, of R&D identified in (3)?  

B5.    What are the opportunities for collaboration?  

Organization  

We will draw up a more detailed list of issues that we would like to cover, and invite speakers as necessary.  We welcome proposals from people wishing to present material, though we shall try to avoid packing the available 18 hours with presentations, leaving no time either for discussions, or for people who come to the workshop with presentations we have not planned for.  Therefore, we propose to set a tentative time limit of 25 minutes (plus five minutes for questions) for most presentations.

 

We shall aim to group presentations according to the issues they address.  There are several ways of doing this; perhaps the most straightforward would be to base the categorization on the particular system.  A basic outline might look as follows:

 

1.      Electron sources  

2.      Positron sources  

2.1         Conventional target sources  

2.2         Undulator sources  

2.3         Other sources  

3.      Damping rings  

3.1         Lattice and dynamics issues and alignment  

3.2         Collective limitations  

3.3         Components design (magnets, kickers, wigglers, RF etc.)  

3.4         Novel designs  

4.      Bunch compressors  

5.      Past, present and future use of the ATF  

6.      Diagnostics  

6.1         Damping Ring diagnostics  

6.2         General injection systems diagnostics  

7.      Other issues  

7.1     e-e- implications

Any scheme for organizing the sessions will need to be flexible.  It is important to start out with some plan at the start of the workshop, but the timetable could change from day to day to suit the needs of the participants.


Contact  lc02@slac.stanford.edu
Last Update: 02/13/02 03:03:19 PM
SLAC